1.1 Introduction:
The
issue of transportation development is at the heart of every nation. Due to economic activities in city
centers, various spaces have been created outside and along streets as a
parking facility for automobiles. Currently, traffic congestion and parking
problems in urban areas are
getting out of hand in
many developing countries. In Ghana, decision makers in most cases favour
removal of on-street parking from major arterials. They argue that this action
might increase road capacity and improve safety. On the other hand, arguments
for allowing on-street parking have traditionally been based on the potential
benefits to local merchants. Innes et al (1990) agrees with the latter by
stating that accessibility and parking convenience are among major factors that
affect shoppers' destination choices.
Recently, city authorities in Ghana
face challenges in the areas of parking infrastructure availability, parking
demand, safety problems of vehicles and pedestrians, time and turnover, pricing
for parking and maintenance of infrastructure. These and many other challenges
make on-street parking a major ‘headache’ and therefore call for answers in
terms of its management. The key objective of this exposé is to expound some
effects of on-street parking and identify measures
to manage on-street
parking.
1.2 Effects of On-Street Parking:
There are benefits of on-street
parking. Litman (2006) explained that aside the convenience, on-street parking
is said to be one of the best ways to provide shared parking. It is thought to
be in higher demand than the alternative off-street spaces and considered more
efficient as a result of higher occupancy rates. For that reason, pricing
proponents such as Shoup suggest setting the highest fees for the on-street
spaces (Shoup, 2004). During one of Los Angeles’ on-street parking bans, the
city started to find a noticeable decline in retail business (Jakle and Sculle,
2004). Without the on-street parking spaces, the convenience factor appeared to
diminish and people shopped elsewhere.
On-street parking is also considered
to be more efficient with regard to land use because on-street spaces do not
require access lanes or driveways (Litman, 2006). Comparing the amount of land
required for an off-street surface lot to that needed for an on-street parking
space, Litman (2006) and Shoup (2004) both estimate that the access lanes and
driveways to the off-street parking lots is more than double the amount of land
devoted to parking. In addition, landscaping requirements generally account for
adding another 10% to 15% of total land area to a parking lot (Litman, 2006).
There is a strong argument that
convenient parking fosters economic growth and development. The placement of
on-street parking near businesses and retail uses improves accessibility and
convenience to customers and has been used as a strategy for revitalization of
central business districts and attraction of renewed consumer patronage to
downtown areas. A number of behavioural studies cited availability of parking
as a factor affecting shoppers' travel decisions. For example, an analysis of
shoppers' behavioural patterns used data from Fredericton, Canada and a binary
logit disaggregate behavioural model to determine the major factors affecting
shoppers' destination choices. The study revealed that the availability of
parking and the accessibility to the shopping area were among the most
important factors in trip decision-making (Innes et al, 1990).
On-street parking is a potential
traffic calming measure. Urban planners promoting new urbanism and
neo-traditional street designs, as well as advocates of livable and walkable
communities and proponents of traffic calming all agree that the use of
on-street parking can have many benefits. On-street parking is viewed as part
of the strategy to reduce motorists speeding through increased side friction.
Replacement of traffic lanes by parking lanes, or reduction of traffic lane
widths to allow for on-street parking show reduction in motorists speeds and
better compliance with posted speed limits. Moreover, alternating of on-street
parking from one side of the road to another can create a chicane-like effect
in residential settings. According to Ewing (1999), this technique is a proven
traffic calming measure that can reduce travel speed and result in benefits
similar to those of actual chicanes at a fraction of the cost.
Among other benefits, properly
designed and placed on-street parking is viewed as a means to create conditions
where large vehicles can use the added space at intersections to improve their
effective turning radii. Sight lines are preserved at intersections with 30- to
50-foot parking setbacks from intersecting legs (Burden, 1999).
On-street parking cannot be said to
have only positive effects. Some of the negative effects are that, firstly,
substitution of a road lane by a parking lane has an important impact on
capacity and a potential effect on traffic operations. This is expected to be
the case when on-street parking is introduced to the state trunk line system.
On-street parking limits street capacity in two ways. Firstly, it pre-empts
lanes that otherwise would be used by moving traffic. Secondly, parking and
un-parking maneuvers frequently reduce the capacity of the adjacent lanes. Even
a single vehicle parked within a curb lane can effectively close the lane to
moving traffic. At higher speeds and during periods of heavy traffic movement,
on-street parking is incompatible with arterial street service and should not
be permitted (AASHTO, 1994).
Furthermore, emergency vehicle access
in some way is affected by on-street parking. On-street parking constitutes a
serious emergency hazard wherever cars block fire hydrants or obstruct fire
apparatus. Parking restrictions in the vicinity of fire stations and fire
hydrants are essential public safety requirements. When placement of on-street
parking is necessary or desirable, available street space must meet
requirements for emergency vehicle maneuvering and fire hose laying (Chick, 1996).
1.3 Regulatory Measures for On-Street Parking:
Since on-street parking is a vital
component especially in economic growth and development in a commercial area
but at the same time can cause havoc if not properly managed, there is the need
to put in place some regulatory mechanisms. On-street parking management
approaches include: pricing actions, marketing initiatives, and enforcement and
adjudication programs (U.S. Department of Transportation, 1980). On-street
parking is controlled (paid) when it is required as a parking management
measure (Palmer and Ferris, 2010). That is, on-street parking pricing in is
done so that most drivers park there for short term errands while parking for
long hours is to be done off-street.
On-street parking restrictions are
effective only if they are properly enforced.
Thus, strong and active enforcement and adjudication programs are
essential. On-street parking enforcement should be considered as a sub-system
of the total parking management system that aims at improving use of existing
parking supply, increasing revenues, improving public and traffic safety, and
enhancing quality of life and business climate. Enforcement tactics, such as
aggressive ticketing, towing, and booting illegally on-street parked vehicles,
have been used in many communities around the nation (U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1981).
When
talking about parking there is no way the issue of parking meter can be
overlooked. Parking meter is an instrument where money is placed before using a
parking facility and this could be manual or automatic. This metered parking is
normally for short term but it all depends on the parking charges which will
determine whether users can afford to pay extra charges or not thence time for
parking (short or long) can be defined.
The
strategies for managing on-street parking are enormous and cut across other
parking needs simply because they work hand in hand to give an effective and
efficient parking management. According
to Litman (2006), the following regulatory mechanisms can be put in place for
effective and efficient on-street parking management:
- Increase enforcement of regulations that are friendly and fair during some periods of the day.
- Reduce on-street parking time limits. This will increase turnover and also free up the area for other users to access it.
- Encourage businesses to share parking facilities. For example, an office building can use the parking spaces during the day and for the cinema hall also to use it during the night.
- Encourage the use of alternative modes. Example, park and ride where people will park and join shuttle service to the commercial area.
- Establish high standards for parking facility design, including aesthetic features and user and environmental safety.
On-street parking space is a scarce
resource, thus, priorities for its use should be established in the public
interest. Managing scarce parking resources means determining if and how
parking should be regulated, ensuring adequate compliance with regulations, and
following up on those who do not comply.
Parking management policies generate a
variety of quantitative and qualitative impacts related to transportation,
development, the environment, neighborhood, and revenue that should be
carefully considered. For example, increasing short-term on-street parking
while decreasing long-term parking may attract additional short-term parkers
and constrain long-term parking, promote transit patronage among long-term
parkers, improve highway level of service and air quality, reduce energy
consumption, and promote economic growth through increased retail sales.
Depending upon the actual new mix of short- and long-term parkers, parking
revenue may either increase or decrease.
1.4 CONCLUSION:
On-street parking space represents a
valuable resource. Thus, on-street parking is very important in every society
especially where commercial activities go on along the road. This is because
where on-street parking spaces are provided, motorists can park their vehicles
and carry out their shopping activities conveniently. However, on-street
parking if not properly managed can cause congestion especially when vehicles
are parked at illegal places on the road. This can pose safety problems to all
road users since moving vehicles can crash with the illegally parked vehicles
or knock pedestrians down when crossing the road due to the blockage of their
view by the parked vehicles. The congestion created by the illegally parked
vehicles on the street and other factors can have multiplier effects such as
delays to people, freight and vehicles, high operating cost of vehicles,
pollution, environmental degradation, casualties and accidents, loss of
productive hours, low economic development and low standard of living in the
long run.
On the other hand, when congestion
management strategies are put in place such as strict enforcement of laws, road
pricing, parking pricing, road capacity expansion, transit improvement and
rideshare programs, the negative effects of on-street parking will be reduced
to the barest minimum. When this is done, the road will be free from heavy
congestion and normal activities of people can be carried out with ease.
Reference:
AASHTO (1994): A Policy on
Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Washington, D.C.
Burden, D. et al. (1999): Street Design
Guidelines for Healthy Neighborhoods. Florida, Center for Livable Communities, High
Springs.
Chick, C. (1996): On-Street
Parking: A Guide to Practice. London, U.K, Landor Publishing.
Ewing, R. (1990): Traffic Calming - State of the Practice. Prepared
by ITE for
U.S. Department of Transportation.
Innes,
D., Ircha, M.C., and Badoe, D.A. (1990): Factors Affecting Automobile Shopping
TripDestinations. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 116, No. 3,
pp. 126-136.
Jakle,
J., and Sculle, K. (2004): Lots of Parking. Charlottesville, University of
Virginia Press.
Litman, T. (2006): Parking Management Best Practices.
Chicago, American Planning Association.
Palmer,
D and Ferris, C (2010): Parking Measures and Policies
Research Review. Geoff
Dawe,
Department for Transport, Transport Research Laboratory.
Shoup,
D. (2004): The Ideal Source of Local Public Revenue. Regional Science and Urban
Economics, Vol. 34, 2004.
U.S.
Department of Transportation (1980): Study of Parking Management Tactics Vol.
1. U.S.A.
U.S.
Department of Transportation (1981): Study of Parking Management Tactics Vol.
3. U.S.A.
No comments:
Post a Comment